Skip to main content

Table 9 Performance comparison between the proposed work (Lwin = 128, OP = 75%, SG feature) and state-of-the-art works as quadruple classifiers based on ICBHI 2017

From: Performance evaluation of lung sounds classification using deep learning under variable parameters

Works

Sen (%)

Spe (%)

Pre (%)

Acc (%)

F1_score (%)

Petmezas et al. [12]

52.78

84.26

76.39

68.52

Acharya et al. [28]

48.63

84.4

Jayalakshmy et al. [32]

92.5

Asatani et al. [33]

63

83

72

Rishabh et al. [38]

67.22

82.87

75.04

Jakovljević et al. [41]

39.56

proposed work

88.3

87.5

94.4

88.7

91.2

  1. The optimum values of performance criteria are highlighted in bold
  2. Acc accuracy, Sen sensitivity or recall, Pre precision, Spe specificity